Asymptomatic uterine perforation and IUD migration to the broad ligament: A case report.

RATIONALE: Uterine perforation is a serious complication of intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) placement. However, as complete uterine perforation and extrauterine migration may remain asymptomatic, thorough localization of the IUD is important prior to reinsertion. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 33-year-old patient who has had 4 IUD insertions, wherein the location of the first IUD (inserted 14 years ago) was not identified prior to reinsertion and replacement of the subsequent three. She presented to hospital with a 6-month history of abdominal pain. Pelvic ultrasonography (US), radiography, hysteroscopy and laparoscopy examinations confirmed that a retained migrated IUD in the right broad ligament. DIAGNOSIS: Uterine perforation, IUD migration to the broad ligament. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent hysteroscopy and laparoscopy. OUTCOMES: Both IUDs were successfully removed without any complications.

Intrauterine device migration into the bladder leading to stones formation.

An intrauterine device (IUD) is a popular method of contraception mainly used in developing countries. Perforation is one of the most serious but a rare complication secondary to the insertion of an IUD, while perforation into the intravesical organs such as the bladder is even more rare. A 30-year-old multipara in early 30s, with two previous caesarean sections (CS) and one curettage, was found to have her IUD puncturing the bladder during a cystoscopy procedure to remove her bladder stones. Transvesical migration of an IUD is an uncommon complication with a high rate of calculi formation, which is thought to be caused by the IUD's lithogenic potential. Imaging approaches such as ultrasound and pelvic X-rays are considered imperative in the accurate diagnosis. Any migrated IUD should be removed regardless of location. Prompt and continual monitoring of women using an IUD is essential and in a case where the IUD has migrated, the removal using the endoscopic approach is a safe and effective method.

[Endoscopic removal of intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon: case report]. / Retrait endoscopique d'un dispositif intra-utérin perforant le côlon sigmoïde: à propos d'un cas.

Intrauterine device (IUD) is the mainstay of family planning methods in developing countries. However, it is associated with severe complications such as bleeding, perforation and migration to adjacent organs. Although perforation of the uterus is not rare, migration to the sigmoid colon is exceptional. We here report a case of IUD migration into sigmoid colon; this was removed via low endoscopy. The study involved a 45-year-old woman using an IUD who presented with pelvic pain associated with a feeling of pelvic heaviness 6 years later of insertion. Clinical examination was without abnormalities, and computed tomography (CT) scan showed the IUD embedded in the sigmoid colon wall. Diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy was performed, which objectified IUD-related intestinal perforation. IUD was partially embedded in the sigmoid colon wall and couldn't be removed. The device was removed during colonoscopy by diathermy loop excision (15 mm in diameter).

Fístula utero-yeyunal secundaria a migración de dispositivo intrauterino: reporte de un caso / Utero-jejunal fistula secondary to intrauterine device migration: a case report

RESUMEN El dispositivo intrauterino (DIU) es un método anticonceptivo muy popular, eficaz y seguro. Aunque posee complicaciones bien descritas como es la migración, la que puede ser a otros órganos dentro de la cavidad peritoneal. La fístula uteroyeyunal es un evento clínico poco frecuente, pero de gran repercusión si no es diagnosticada y tratada. Se presenta el caso de una paciente usuaria de DIU, el que migra a cavidad abdominal, con posterior formación de fístula uteroyeyunal.

ABSTRACT The intrauterine device is a popular, efficient and safe contraceptive. Although it has some well described complications, such as migration, which may be to the different organs inside of the peritoneal cavity. The uterus-jejunal fistula is a rare clinical event, but with great repercussion if it is not well assessed and treated properly. We present the clinical case of a patient with a migrated intrauterine device and a fistula uterus-jejunal formation.

[Intravascular migration of a contraceptive implant]. / Intravasculaire migratie van een hormoonimplantaat.

BACKGROUND: The Implanon NXT is a commonly used contraceptive. Incorrect localization of the implant can cause complications. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 41-year-old woman is seen in the gynaecology outpatient clinic with a request to remove a recently placed Implanon NXT because of worsening mood symptoms. The implant can't be found on physical and ultrasound examination. Duringsurgicalexplorationthe implant is not found at theinsertion site' By means of X-ray scanning the implant becomes visible around the humeral head. The implant appears to be located in the cephalic vein and is subsequently removed. CONCLUSION: In case of a referral due to because of worsening mood symptoms after an Implanon NXT exchange, it is possible that the implant is localized incorrectly. It is recommended to use additional imaging before performing surgical exploration. Furthermore, it is important to insert the Implanon NXT according to the supplied instructions to prevent this complication.

[A woman with abdominal pain after insertion of an intra-uterine device]. / Een vrouw met buikpijn na insertie van een spiraaltje.

A clinical picture of a 35-year-old woman presented at the gynaecology department with a positive pregnancy test even though she had an intra-uterine device (IUD) inserted three months previously. During laparoscopy the Ballerina IUD turns out to be located in the appendix.

A 47-Year-Old Woman with Gastric Transmigration of an Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Managed by Laparoscopic Wedge Gastric Resection.

BACKGROUND Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) are commonly used. Although IUCD use is considered safe, one adverse event is uterine perforation and its migration into surrounding organs. Migrations into the urinary bladder and the intestine have been sometimes reported. We here report a very rare case in which an IUCD migrated into the stomach; gastric endoscopy incidentally revealed the IUCD half embedded and half in the gastric lumen. To our knowledge, this is the second report ever of IUCD migration into the stomach. CASE REPORT A 47-year-old woman with BMI 36.2 visited us as a candidate for an intragastric balloon to reduce her weight. An IUCD was inserted 18 years ago and was not yet removed. Diagnostic gastric endoscopy revealed a foreign body appearing to be an IUCD. Endoscopic removal failed. Computed tomography indicated the presence of an IUCD through the gastric cavity and thus we performed laparoscopic removal of the IUCD with wedge resection of the stomach. A penetrating IUCD was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS A gastric foreign body can be a migrated IUCD. Although rare, we must be aware that IUCDs can migrate into unexpected organs.

Pelvic pain.

When a complete metabolic panel offered no clues, we turned to imaging. And that's when we had our diagnosis.

Dislocated intrauterine devices: clinical presentations, diagnosis and management.

OBJECTIVE: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are globally one of the most popular methods of contraception. Uterine perforation is one of the most significant complications of IUD use and commonly occurs at the time of IUD insertion rather than presenting as delayed migration. This paper reports a series of 13 cases of displaced IUDs requiring retrieval by laparoscopy or laparotomy. All the IUDs were copper bearing and most perforations occurred immediately after IUD insertion. CASES: In two patients with sigmoid colon injury and IUD penetration of the appendix, laparoscopic management had failed and laparotomy was necessary owing to severe obliteration of the pelvic cavity. In one patient laparotomy was the preferred surgical approach owing to acute bowel perforation. In the remaining patients, the displaced devices were successfully removed by laparoscopy. CONCLUSION: Uterine perforation and IUD migration to the organs in the abdominopelvic cavity are serious complications of IUD insertion and can be successfully managed by laparoscopy, or by laparotomy in the presence of severe pelvic adhesions or unexpected complications.

Uterine dimensions and intrauterine device malposition: can ultrasound predict displacement or expulsion before it happens?

OBJECTIVE: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are the most commonly used method of long-acting reversible contraception. IUD malpositions are described as expulsion, embedding, displacement, and perforation, which may cause contraception failure, organ injury, hemorrhage, and infection. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between displacement and IUD positioning in the uterus, and uterine dimensions as measured using transvaginal ultrasonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-hundred and eighty-four patients who had TCu380A devices inserted at a tertiary hospital were evaluated at insertion and at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after insertion. At the insertion visit, demographic characteristics, history of menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, previous IUD displacement, and obstetric history were recorded. Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of the uterine cavity, uterine length, uterine width, cervix length, cervix width, transverse diameter of the uterine cavity, the distance between the tip of the IUD and the fundus, and endometrium were measured to evaluate IUD displacement. RESULTS: Sixteen of 384 patients had displacement. There were significant differences in times between last pregnancy outcomes and IUD insertion and dysmenorrhea history (p = 0.004 and p = 0.028, respectively). Among TCu380A users, women with 7.5 mm IUD endometrium distances had a higher risk for displacement with a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 37.5% (AUC: 0.607, 95% CI 0.51-0.70). Women with uterus width less than 41.5 mm were more likely to have displacement with a sensitivity of 53.8% and a specificity of 75% (AUC: 0.673, 95% CI 0.60-0.75). CONCLUSION: IUD endometrium distance and uterus width are important parameters for displacement for TCu380A.

The role of multimodality radiological imaging in extrauterine misplaced IUCD: A case report.

Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) is among the commonly used contraceptive methods in the world including sub-Saharan Africa but have been associated with a number of complications that although rare, can occur. Uterine perforation is the most serious complication of the IUCD. Surgical management is required in cases with complete uterine perforation, in which the IUCD is partially or completely within the peritoneal cavity. We present a case of a 27year old para 2 woman reporting with mild lower abdominal pains and the absence of IUCD string in the vagina after its insertion following evacuation of the uterus 2 years prior to this study. With the utilization of multiple imaging modalities, an exploratory laparotomy was done to remove the migrated IUCD and repair of the perforated bowel and urinary bladder.

An Effective Method Combining Various Endoscopes in the Treatment of Intravesical Migrated Intrauterine Device.

OBJECTIVE: To introduce an effective method combining various endoscopes in the treatment of intravesical migrated intrauterine device (IUD). DESIGN: A step-by-step explanation of the surgery using video, approved by the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. SETTING: Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. INTERVENTIONS: A 39-year-old young woman, in whom an IUD was inserted 2 months prior, presented with frequent urination after IUD insertion. Cystoscope and pelvic computed tomography were performed, and the results showed an IUD in the bladder. The migrated IUD was found partly in the uterus and partly in the bladder by hysteroscope and cystoscope. Management of the migrated IUD consists of 4 steps: (1) lysing the adhesion between the bladder and uterus, (2) suturing the bladder and taking the IUD part out of the bladder, (3) removing the IUD part in the uterus, and (4) suturing the bladder again to reinforce it and suturing the uterus. CONCLUSION: The migrated IUD in the bladder was successfully and completely extracted by the method combining various endoscopes; operative time was 56 minutes. In the follow-up period the patient did not report any symptoms of frequency urination. This surgical process has the following characteristics: Preoperative examination should be performed to clarify the ectopic site of the IUD, various endoscopes should be combined for diagnosis and treatment, and endoscopic surgery is an effective treatment method for migrated IUD.

Endoscopic removal of an incidentally discovered intrauterine contraceptive device eroding into the rectum.

Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) is a common birth control method. It is safe but can be associated with serious complications including migration into the peritoneal cavity and penetration into other intra-abdominal and pelvic viscera; most commonly the rectosigmoid colon. Different retrieval methods including endoscopy, laparoscopy or open abdominal surgery have been described. We report the case of 38-year-old woman who became pregnant shortly after insertion of the IUCD 6 years prior to presentation. She delivered vaginally and 'expulsion' of the device was assumed. Some 4 years later, she had another IUCD inserted and remained asymptomatic till she recently presented with iron-deficiency anaemia. As part of the investigation, diagnostic colonoscopy was performed. Surprisingly, the old IUCD was found penetrating into the midrectum. Uneventful endoscopic removal was performed and she remained well at 3-month follow-up. Migrating IUCD remains asymptomatic and may be discovered accidentally during routine investigation for some other symptoms.

Extensive intravesical benign hyperplasia induced by an extravesical migrated intrauterine device: A case report.

RATIONALE: Intravesical migrated intrauterine devices (IUDs) have been reported to cause bladder perforation, stone formation, or malignant transition. However, such extensive intravesical benign hyperplasia caused by an extravesical migrated IUD is firstly reported. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 38-year-old woman suffered from recurrent urinary urgency and dysuria and without macroscopic hematuria for about 1 month. DIAGNOSES: Urinary ultrasound and abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed thickening of the bladder walls. Diagnostic transurethral resection and pathology initially misdiagnosed the intravesical lesions as non-invasive urothelial carcinoma. Further diagnostic and therapeutic transurethral resections and pathology confirmed the intravesical lesions to be extensive benign hyperplasia, which was extremely likely caused by the extravesical migrated IUD. INTERVENTIONS: The intravesical lesions received therapeutic transurethral resections. Then the migrated IUD was removed by open surgery. OUTCOMES: After above treatments, the patient's lower urinary tract symptoms gradually disappeared. No recurrent lesion was found in the bladder through CT 3 months later. LESSONS: Even an extravesical migrated IUD could silently cause extensive intravesical lesions. Whether symptomatic or not, any migrated IUD including extravesical and intravesical ones should be treated seriously, if possible, removed as soon as possible.

Emergent Laparoscopic Removal of a Perforating Intrauterine Device During Pregnancy Under Regional Anesthesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To describe and demonstrate a technique for laparoscopic removal of a perforating intrauterine device (IUD) during pregnancy, and to provide tips to facilitate safe laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy. DESIGN: Video presentation of the technique for laparoscopic removal of a perforating IUD in a pregnant woman. SETTING: Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences, and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy. INTERVENTION: A 30-year-old woman, gravida 3, para 2, with a copper T IUD (Nova T 380; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) perforating the left adnexa presented to the emergency room complaining of left lower quadrant pain. The patient had the IUD inserted by her gynecologist 3 months before the onset of the symptoms. Ultrasound revealed a 6-week intrauterine pregnancy with the presence of fetal cardiac activity along with the IUD perforating the left adnexa. The patient returned at 11 weeks of gestation complaining of worsening abdominal pain and excruciating left lower quadrant pain. She was scheduled for laparoscopic excision of the perforating IUD [1-3]. Considering her pregnancy, laparoscopy under regional anesthesia was performed in the minimal Trendelenburg position at 12 degrees, through open laparoscopic access [4]. Intra-abdominal pressure of 8 mmHg and ultrasound energy to cut and coagulate, avoiding monopolar/bipolar energy owing to the presence of a copper IUD, were used. The IUD and tube were extracted in an endobag through umbilical access, under a 5-mm, 0-degree telescope in left lateral access [5]. The procedure was carried out uneventfully, and the IUD was removed. Fetal viability was confirmed after the procedure. At the time of this report, the patient was in the 23rd week of gestation, and the pregnancy was progressing without any problems. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic removal of perforated IUD during pregnancy under regional anesthesia is a feasible and safe option that should be considered when needed.